<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Knowledge on Ataraxia</title>
    <link>/en/tags/knowledge/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Knowledge on Ataraxia</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:01:35 +0300</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/en/tags/knowledge/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Brain.fm vs Endel vs Mind Focus: A comparison</title>
      <link>/en/posts/brainfm-endel-vs-mindfocus/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:01:35 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>/en/posts/brainfm-endel-vs-mindfocus/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s impossible not to be biased about something you&amp;rsquo;ve created, but I&amp;rsquo;m going to make this analysis as honest as I can, really.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That includes acknowledging that these two alternatives to Mind Focus have some pretty good things going for them, and I won&amp;rsquo;t deny that, because it helps no one.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That said, there are &lt;strong&gt;important differences&lt;/strong&gt; and it&amp;rsquo;s worth understanding them before paying for any of the options.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;brainfm&#34;&gt;Brain.fm&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Brain.fm has been at this for years and has genuine scientific backing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The ethics and philosophy behind Mind Focus</title>
      <link>/en/posts/ethics-and-philosophy/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:01:35 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>/en/posts/ethics-and-philosophy/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ethics and philosophy, things you barely hear anymore and are said even less. School teachings from when I was young, but that (at least for me) always seemed important. Probably because I&amp;rsquo;ve always slept well, I&amp;rsquo;ve always been aware of how valuable that is and I want to keep it that way.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That&amp;rsquo;s why I&amp;rsquo;ve brought those two words to the dance in everything I&amp;rsquo;ve done, and also in the everyday work that puts food on my table.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Flowmodoro is the ultimate productivity technique</title>
      <link>/en/posts/flowmodoro-ultimate-productivity-technique/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:01:35 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>/en/posts/flowmodoro-ultimate-productivity-technique/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Is this article another text riddled with studies that I, and only I, find interesting?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Of course.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This is my obsession and my house, but I also &lt;strong&gt;like it when whoever makes a claim actually proves it&lt;/strong&gt;. It&amp;rsquo;s the right thing to do, the burden of proof and all that, which seems lost these days. So let&amp;rsquo;s get started.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Pomodoro technique works&lt;/strong&gt;, that&amp;rsquo;s undeniable, which is why it was the first I implemented in Mind Focus back when it was just an ugly app on my phone for strictly personal use.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The science behind Mind Focus</title>
      <link>/en/posts/science-behind-mindfocus/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:01:35 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>/en/posts/science-behind-mindfocus/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Since I&amp;rsquo;m too obsessive for my own good, and one of the most sceptical people I know, Mind Focus is not a collection of features chosen at random, but rather a reflection of my neurosis for &lt;strong&gt;applying what has been shown to work according to data and what has also worked for me personally&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That&amp;rsquo;s why every element of the app (the background noises, the breathing techniques, the attention exercises, the tones&amp;hellip;) &lt;strong&gt;has real science behind it&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why the isochronic tones in Mind Focus are different</title>
      <link>/en/posts/mindfocus-tones-difference/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 00:01:35 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>/en/posts/mindfocus-tones-difference/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;ve searched for isochronic tones on YouTube or any productivity &lt;em&gt;app&lt;/em&gt;, you know what it is like: an audio recording that plays on a loop. Forty minutes of something pulsing at a certain frequency, a sound file that someone produced at some point.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;And it works in some ways (saying otherwise would be a lie), &lt;strong&gt;but it could work way better&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;For starters, an isochronic tone designed in the traditional way has a structural limitation that often gets overlooked: &lt;strong&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s a loop&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are isochronic tones more effective than binaural beats?</title>
      <link>/en/posts/isochronic-vs-binaural-beats/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:01:35 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>/en/posts/isochronic-vs-binaural-beats/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Both types of sound work to influence our concentration, but as to whether isochronic tones do it better than binaural beats, the real answer is: &lt;strong&gt;Most likely yes&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That&amp;rsquo;s why I&amp;rsquo;ve chosen them for Mind Focus as the main soundscape (and because that greater effectiveness has also held true in my personal experience all these years).&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;However, we must be honest and make clear that, apart from personal experience, the direct research conclusively proving this is still not very extensive, &lt;strong&gt;because it&amp;rsquo;s a field that is still understudied&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What are isochronic tones and why they work</title>
      <link>/en/posts/what-are-isochronic-tones/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 00:01:35 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>/en/posts/what-are-isochronic-tones/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When I set out to build Mind Focus I started from a well-known principle in neuroscience:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The brain tends to synchronise its activity with external rhythmic stimuli&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If something emits a pulse at a certain frequency, repeatedly and consistently, the brainwave patterns are &lt;em&gt;entrained&lt;/em&gt; towards that frequency.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This is known as brainwave synchronisation or &lt;em&gt;brainwave entrainment&lt;/em&gt; and has been studied for decades.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Following this principle, isochronic tones are sound pulses that switch on and off at a precise frequency, at a rhythm that the ear processes and that, &lt;strong&gt;if maintained long enough, begins to influence the brain&amp;rsquo;s activation patterns&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
